Interesting! I like it!

The conversational context is nice. The ongoing command building is convenient and the # syntax carryover makes a lot of sense!

My next step is recursion and composability. I want to be able to do things contextualized. Stuff like this:

   $ echo PUBLIC_KEY=(( get the users public key pertaining to the private key for this repo )) >> .env

or some other contextually complex thing that is actually fairly simple, just tedious to code. Then I want that <as the code> so people collectively program and revise stuff <at that level as the language>.

Then you can do this through composability like so:

    with ((find the variable store for this repo by looking in the .gitignore)) as m:
      ((write in the format of m))SSH_PUBLICKEY=(( get the users public key pertaining to the private key for this repo ))

or even recursively:

    (( 
      (( 
        ((rsync, rclone, or similar)) with compression 
      ))  
        $HOME exclude ((find directories with secrets))         
        ((read the backup.md and find the server)) 
        ((make sure it goes to the right path))
    ));

it's not a fully formed syntax yet but then people will be able to do something like:

    $ llm-compile --format terraform --context my_infra script.llm > some_code.tf

and compile publicly shared snippets as specific to their context and you get abstract infra management at a fractional complexity.

It's basically GCC's RTL but for LLMs.

The point of this approach is your building blocks remain fairly atomic simple dumb things that even a 1b model can reliably handle - kinda like the guarantee of the RTL.

Then if you want to move from terraform to opentofu or whatever, who cares ... your stuff is in the llm metalanguage ... it's just a different compile target.

It's kinda like PHP. You just go along like normal and occasionally break form for the special metalanguage whenever your hit a point of contextual variance.