I think it’s fair to push for clear attribution in these cases, but it’s also important to remember that the MIT license is intentionally permissive. It was designed to make sharing code easy without too many hoops. If Ollama is genuinely trying to be part of the open-source community, a little transparency and acknowledgment can avoid a lot of bad blood.
MIT is permissive given you follow the license. You can't just copy the code and omit the license and copyright, that's not fine, even if many people like to pretend that it is.
It's permissive; but that doesn't imply not crediting people for their work