kiitos 6 days ago

MCP is literally defined as a protocol.

It doesn't have anything to say about the transport layer, and certainly doesn't mandate stdio as a transport.

> The main feature of MCP is auth

MCP has no auth features/capabilities.

I think you're tilting at windmills here.

2
pgt 6 days ago

I regret to inform you that you are the victim of quality control, Sir @kiitos:

1. MCP specifies two transport layers: stdio/stdout + HTTP w/SSE [^1]

2. MCP specifies JSON-RPC as the wire format [^2].

In my opinion, this is a schema on top of a pre-existing RPC protocol, not a new protocol.

I implemented the stdio transport, the JSON-RPC wire format & Tools support of the spec in Modex[^3].

- [^1]: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/docs/concepts/transports

- [^2]: https://modelcontextprotocol.io/specification/2025-03-26

- [^3]: https://github.com/theronic/modex

pgt 6 days ago

Re: Auth, you are correct that MCP does not specify auth (aside from env vars for e.g. API keys which is host-specific – another gripe of mine).

However, practically the host (e.g. Claude Desktop by Anthropic) asks for permission before calling specific MCP tools.

It is not part of the MCP spec, but it's part of most host implementations of MCP and one of the big practical reasons for MCP's existence is to avoid giving models carte blanche HTTP access.

IMO this should be part of the MCP spec, e.g. "you can call this GET /weather endpoint any time, but to make payments via this POST /transactions request, ask for permission once or always."

Aside: just because someone "defines <X> as something" does not make it true.

pgt 6 days ago

And this why I call it EEE: if Anthropic had simply added HTTP API endpoints with auth, everyone would have copied it, and Anthropic would have no control over the spec, which can keep future contenders out.

The MCP spec is a moat, and we’ve seen this movie before, whether they intended it to be or not. I use it, but I don’t have to like it, i.e. MCP should not exist.

As previously stated [^1], OpenAI can one-up them by simply supporting any API endpoint + auth and it would be way more powerful, no moat to defend against startups. No VC-funded corp can resist a moat.

[^1]: 2025-03-06: https://x.com/petrustheron/status/1897760788116652065?s=46