#define hc_task_yield(task)
do {
task->state = __LINE__;
return;
case __LINE__:;
} while (0)
Minor correction, macros CANT have newlines, you need to splice them during preprocessing using \ followed by a new line, the actual code has these:
from https://github.com/codr7/hacktical-c/blob/main/macro/macro.h
#define hc_align(base, size) ({ \ __auto_type _base = base; \ __auto_type _size = hc_min((size), _Alignof(max_align_t)); \ (_base) + _size - ((ptrdiff_t)(_base)) % _size; \ }) \
After preprocessing it is a single line.
We might get multi-line macros in C2y standard: https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n3524.txt
Credit to Simon Tatham
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/coroutines.html
> no commonly used high level language supports the coroutine call primitive
Shows how old this post is. In fact I remember reading it well over 10 years ago, maybe more like 20. archive.org says that it's at least as old as 2001. A great article.
I'm very excited to see he's published a new article on C++20 coroutines. I've read (or maybe skimmed...) a few introductions and not really got them, despite having used C# and Python coroutines a lot with no problems (even making changes to an async runtime for Python). Given how clear his C coroutine article is, I'm optimistic about the C++ article.
> So, after the course, I went away and studied on my own, and wrote the introduction to C++ coroutines that I’d have liked to see.
https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/corou...
I knew the name sounded familiar:
Simon Tatham's Portable Puzzle Collection https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/puzzles/
With GNU extensions, you can make a simpler coroutine macro without switch/case abuse:
#define CO_BEGIN static void* cr_state_ = &&cr_st_0; goto *cr_state_; cr_st_0:
#define CO_RETURN(x) ({ __label__ resume; cr_state_ = &&resume; return (x); resume:; })I've written C on-and-off for over 30 years (just various throw-away prototypes and OS/app interaction microbenchmarks) and it took a while + a web search to get it. Diabolical indeed. Edit: And makes sense in hindsight.