It's an interesting point that passion-jobs that creatives take on (including game dev) tend to get paid less, and where the thrilling component is disrupted there could be less incentive to bother entering the field.
I think for the most part creatives will still line up for these gigs, because they care about contributing to the end products, not the amount of time they spend using Blender.
You are again just thinking from the perspective of a manager: Yes, if these ai jobs need to be filled, artists will be the people filling them. But from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling. So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides.
> from the artists perspective there are fewer jobs, and the jobs that do remain are less fulfilling.
Re-read what I wrote. You repeated what I said.
> So: from the perspective of a large part of the workforce it is completely true and rational to say that ai at their job has mostly downsides.
For them, maybe.