blueflow 8 days ago

What else should the test runner do?

2
pavel_lishin 8 days ago

There must be a better way to tell if a repo is a Sapling repo than by running some arbitrary binary, right?

Symbiote 8 days ago

For Git one could look for .git/config. There must be something equivalent.

remram 7 days ago

.git will be a file and not a directory, if you are in a submodule or a worktree.

You just illustrated why trying to assume the functionality of a third-party app instead of calling it creates even more bugs.

pasc1878 8 days ago

Use the full path of sl and not rely on $PATH in the same way cron and macOS GUI apps do for I assume this exact reason.

stonegray 8 days ago

Is the full path guaranteed? For example homebrew, snap, and apt might put it all in different places. $PATH is a useful tool.

pasc1878 8 days ago

But not in this case where you have two executables with the same name.

You have to know where the tool was installed or else be certain no other sl is on your path.

Joker_vD 8 days ago

How would knowing the full path help you anyway? It's either in "/usr/bin/sl", or "/usr/local/bin", or "~/.local/bin", now what?

By the way, believe it or not, POSIX compliance requires existence of only two directories (/dev and /tmp) and three files (/dev/console, /dev/null, and /dev/tty) on the system; everything else is completely optional, including existence of /bin, /etc, and /usr.

pasc1878 7 days ago

Because you know what you installed and so which sl to use.

Joker_vD 7 days ago

But the sl is not invoked by you. It is invoked by some npm module (a 5-times-removed dependency from any side) which hopes that either there is "sl" in the $PATH and it is the Sapling CLI, or there is no "sl" in the $PATH. This module can't use absolute paths because it does not know how the end user's system looks.

pasc1878 7 days ago

In that case it is a large security risk as well as it does not work as per the article

Joker_vD 6 days ago

A program invoking some other the program that the user themself consciously have installed on their system (and put into the PATH) is not a security risk per se, it's literally UNIX Way™ working as intended.

skipants 8 days ago

What if the full path is just `/usr/bin/sl`?

pasc1878 8 days ago

Then yopu get the sl there which could be correct.

charcircuit 8 days ago

Finding the full path of sl requires looking at $PATH

pasc1878 8 days ago

In this case not as then you find the wrong sl - you need to know where the correct sl was installed.