rdtsc 1 day ago

The deaths breakdown by region is interesting:

Africa: 1.8M

South America: 149k

North America: 179k

Australia: 4k

Europe: 434k

Asia: 6.3M

I guess to keep it positive, I'd say "Great job, Australia"!

3
NhanH 1 day ago

Asia has about 4.8B population, Australia has 26M. On a per capita basis Australia has about 1x% more deaths

rdtsc 1 day ago

> Asia has about 4.8B population, Australia has 26M. On a per capita basis Australia has about 1x% more deaths

6.3e6/4.8e9 = 0.00131

4e3/26e6 = 0.00015

About 9x as bad?

Not sure about 1x%, was that 1% worse? I am sorry I might have misunderstood that.

NhanH 1 day ago

I meant 11-19%, did mental maths so I did not want to specify exact value.

Though my maths seems to be wrong as well!

timbit42 1 day ago

1x% to me would mean between 10% and 19% inclusive.

brokegrammer 1 day ago

My thoughts exactly. Africa and Asia see the highest numbers but this is proportional to the population count. Plus, countries in these regions have less advanced healthcare than in countries like Australia, but the latter still has a higher death rate. Quite mysterious.

defrost 1 day ago

On a per capita basis, Australia has world class epidemiology, medical record keeping, and "no sparrow falls" cause of death certification . . .

This might be a case of a shortfall in record keeping and open reporting.

TimByte 1 day ago

> I guess to keep it positive, I'd say "Great job, Australia"!

Would be interesting to see how much of that is due to proactive regulation

rdtsc 1 day ago

I would guess better regulation, better medicine, less reliance of burning coal

more-nitor 1 day ago

hmmm not accounting for population size differences?