FerretFred 4 days ago

Yeah, I found this when I was Boinc protein folding for Covid. The work units ran for hours, my towercPC nearly melted, and then I found that this produced mere milliseconds of simulation!

2
jxjnskkzxxhx 4 days ago

Now consider that the Planck time is actually 1e-44 secs.

atemerev 3 days ago

Hardly any actual physical simulations simulate every possible moment in time. We just calculate consequences of current events and put them in the queue to happen sometime in the future. And there's evidence that the real world works in a similar way.

dekhn 3 days ago

Bonds jiggle and wiggle with characteristic times in femtoseconds, and most people believe it's not necessary to simulate at higher frequencies than that.

jxjnskkzxxhx 3 days ago

Yes, I agree with that. My point was just that stimulating a rudimentary model of reality is hard work, but reality is way more complex than even that.

xattt 4 days ago

> nearly melted

I’ll be that guy, but a computationally complex problem won’t push your computer to a temperature beyond design limits.

JohnHaugeland 3 days ago

It’s just a turn of the phrase.

When someone says that the sky is falling, that also doesn’t need to be explained

FerretFred 2 days ago

You're welcome to come to my attic office in summer, as they ambient temperature reaches 200F m a sunny day and my obsolete-but-powerful tower PC consumes 350W power and adds to the tropical heat :)

LoganDark 4 days ago

> a computationally complex problem won’t push your computer to a temperature beyond design limits.

Allegedly. It allegedly won't do that.

Practically, running your CPU at design limits for a very long period of time tends to cause the temperature of the rest of the chassis to want to equalize to that temperature, which can be above comfort limits.

userbinator 3 days ago

It may if components are marginal... https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43008879