Like judges, recuse themselves from work that their regulatory role may have affected for a decade, and given them a good stipend.
As it is now, like with the military, there is no effective counterforce to the corporations
So some kind of freeze-out period?
What about people who are genuinely interested in pushing the state-of-the-art in the industry? Would you want those people to avoid regulatory jobs in the first place? I could easily imagine folks like that not wanting to take an active role in the regulatory process if it meant they had to sit on the sidelines for a decade afterward.
But yeah, that seems reasonable
People pushing the state of the art are pretty much not who we want setting regulations to protect us from people pushing state of the art :)