> The IP doesn't change, so technically it's static. We never said it was exclusive.
That's a pretty wild take. Was there no alternative ISP?
Not in that particular locality, the only alternative was cellular with a cradlepoint at 10x spend for 1/2 the bandwidth, and connectivity issues in bad weather.
It was buried in the fine print related to IPv4 exhaustion.
The CFO I was working with was as flabbergasted as I after we'd found out, but I've seen it a few times now, even when there is another option because of a duopoly in an area.