And it still can't answer this:
Q: "9.11 and 9.9, which one is larger?"
A: "To determine which number is larger between 9.11 and 9.9, let's compare them step by step. Both numbers have the same whole number part: 9. 9.11 has a 1 in the tenths place. 9.9 has a 9 in the tenths place. Since 9 (from 9.9) is greater than 1 (from 9.11), we can conclude that 9.9 is larger than 9.11."
"Final Answer: 9.9"
I don't think anything else needs to be said here.
I suggest we’ve already now passed what shall be dubbed the jschoe test ;)
I will now refer to this as the jschoe test in my writing and publications as well!
It's interesting to think that maybe one of the most realistic consequences of reaching artificial superintelligence will be when its answers start wildly diverging from human expectations and we think it's being "increasingly wrong".
jschoe's post is actually a Turing test for us. :)
(just kidding jschoe)
> I don't think anything else needs to be said here.
Will this humbling moment change your opinion?
Lol, well I guess we've a achieved the functional equivalent of AGI, at least for you. Please don't delete your comment.
I’ve legit seen a heated online debate with hundreds of comments about this question (maybe not the exact numbers), and I don’t think most participants were memeing. People are that bad at math. It’s depressing.
+1 to Deepseek
-1 to humanity
Sorry, I don't quite see what is wrong here.
Parent is thinking Semantic Versioning.
9.9 is larger than 9.11. This right here is the perfect example of the dunning-kruger effect.
Maybe try rephrase your question to "which version came later, 9.9 or 9.11".
This is hilarious, especially if it's unintentional.