defrost 1 day ago

Steel frame, flame retardant insulation and cladding, rammed earth, .. these are all options.

Flammable trees well away from a leaf free clean guttered (or no gutter) house are also no compromise requirements.

See: https://research.csiro.au/bushfire/ and https://www.csiro.au/en/work-with-us/services/testing-and-ce...

for the rabbit hole of Australian Bushfire housing certification and testing.

Burning Down the House: Trial by Fire CSIRO- https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KBtawn7IAnI

3
throw0101a 1 day ago

> Steel frame, flame retardant insulation and cladding, rammed earth, .. these are all options.

Don't even have to go that far.

Wood framing is fine: make your cladding stucco would do a lot (or brick). You can even have siding as cement-base stuff is available:

* https://www.jameshardie.com/blog/siding-types/what-is-fiber-...

You could have metal or clay roofing, but shingles with a Class A rating is available as well:

* https://www.ameriproroofing.com/blog/asphalt-roofing-shingle...

sdiupIGPWEfh 1 day ago

> flame retardant insulation

Which are almost definitely known to the state of California to cause cancer.

defrost 1 day ago

Elsewhere fiberglass and mineral wool insulation aren't regarded as carcinogens.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1947241/

https://mesothelioma.net/fiberglass-connection-to-mesothelio...

inferiorhuman 21 hours ago

  mineral wool insulation aren't regarded as carcinogens
A quick look turned up one mineral wool SDS with a Prop 65 warning for formaldehyde.

https://www.jm.com/content/dam/jm/global/en/MSDS/20000000205...

defrost 20 hours ago

From your link:

SECTION 11. TOXICOLOGICAL INFORMATION

  IARC No component of this product present at levels greater than or equal to 0.1% is identified as probable, possible or confirmed human carcinogen by IARC.

  ACGIH No component of this product present at levels greater than or equal to 0.1% is identified as a carcinogen or potential carcinogen by ACGIH.

  OSHA No component of this product present at levels greater than or equal to 0.1% is identified as a carcinogen or potential carcinogen by OSHA
> warning for formaldehyde.

Trace amounts can possibly sweat out in specific conditions .. which is why you might choose to install with a vapor barrier.

inferiorhuman 18 hours ago

  Trace amounts can possibly sweat out in specific conditions
Nah, it's pretty well documented heat and humidity will release formaldehyde. In paperwork filed with the EPA arguing against new limits, an insulation manufacturer trade group cited California's (OEHHA) exposure limits on formaldehyde as reasonable.

Those limits are:

  recently manufactured products contribute no more than 9 µg/m3 of
  formaldehyde into the indoor air
So the Prop 65 warning certainly seems reasonable from here.

https://downloads.regulations.gov/EPA-HQ-OPPT-2023-0613-0230...

defrost 5 hours ago

Vapor barriers limit human exposure, it has to travel into the occupied spaces to be an issue, then linger.

It also has to be the type of wool that has been treated, etc.

Dig1t 1 day ago

Yes absolutely, and as another poster pointed out, earthquake codes exist. Metal framing is probably a bit easier to adapt to the same earthquake codes that timber framing has.