Lyngbakr 16 hours ago

I had exactly the same experience (minus reading the book). Often, I'd just see the function signature and no further explanation. I do realise that it takes a lot of time and effort to build up extensive docs, but it happened enough that I put it down and started looking for another Lisp that compiles down to a binary.

1
behnamoh 14 hours ago

I'm curious, which Lisp did you end up choosing?

Lyngbakr 14 hours ago

I'm still looking around, but Owl is a frontrunner.

cess11 14 hours ago

If the bigger runtime isn't a deal breaker, maybe look at Racket.

behnamoh 12 hours ago

Racket has great documentation but unfortunately even its creatures have moved in to Rhombus which is a non lisp.

cess11 4 hours ago

Not so sure anyone is using Rhombus besides the few people working on it.