Some serious testicular fortitude in that guy.
If a civilian gets caught doing something illegal, they are entitled to a fair trial with a jury of their peers. If a military member gets caught doing the same thing, the court martial is a mere formality, they just more or less go straight to jail for a very long time.
Wait, you give up civil rights to be in the military? Is this outlined to people when they sign up?
Yes it’s made very clear in the enlistment contract (the military equivalent of an employment agreement) that they’re waiving certain rights and submit themselves to military jurisdiction for offenses covered under the UCMJ.
This topic has been litigated a lot in front of SCOTUS like with Standard Form 86 (where one waives the right to free speech for security clearance) so there’s certain language they have to contain to be valid.
Wow, TIL that if you're drafted (and forced to serve against your will), the government can subject you to military law (UCMJ), which limits many of your rights, like the right to a civilian trial by jury.
Courts have upheld this because Congress has the power to regulate the military, but it still feels like a huge shift in rights for someone forced to serve.
It feels... intuitively unjust that the government could compel service and then subject individuals to a system that limits their constitutional rights.
seems very logical considering the last centuries. nation state needs military, military needs people to STFU and do what needs to be done.
and unfair, considering that rich people always found ways to dodge the draft or serve in armchair positions, but taking this into account it's just even more obvious that special interests did what they usually do.
Yes. See the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uniform_Code_of_Military_Justi...