> That this has created a discourse that goes beyond that was not intended.

I think the thing started off fine and reasonable, but if you go down the comments it takes a turn towards cynical and antagonistic where people are assuming the worst. Which is basically the point of my comment, rust related things seems to have these weird blow ups.

Some quotes

> Redis team has the required Rust proficiency, nor that they actually care about maintaining this crate

> Concepts of a plan eh?

> Of course they don't have a list of missing features, it's not about features. It's about taking control of a ecosystem that's collasping under them because of widly percieved-as shady license rug pulling.

In bold too

> What you care about is your customers, not the community or any contributors.

Then there's headlines like

> Redis Inc seeks control over Rust Redis-rs library, talk of trademark concerns

Its overall inflammatory, when the intention from the emails shown seem fine and the goals seem clear.