mrkeen 1 day ago

> DevOps Team Is Happier Than Ever

Or course they are. The original value proposition of cloud providers managing your infra (and moreso with k8s) was that you could fire your ops team (now called "DevOps" because the whole idea didn't pan out) and the developers could manage their services directly.

In any case, your DevOps team has job security now.

1
adamtulinius 1 day ago

It doesn't take any more competent people to self-host a modern stack, than it does to babysit how a company uses something like Azure.

The original value proposition is false, and more and more are realising this.

flumpcakes 5 hours ago

Hammer meet nail. I currently work in a more traditional "ops" team with our cloud infrastructure dictated by development (through contract hires at first, and now a new internal DevOps team). It's mind boggling how poorly they run things. It goes so deep it's almost issues at product design stage. There's now a big project to move the responsibility back into our team because it's not fit for purpose.

I think an operations background gives you a strong ability to smell nonsense and insecurity. The DevOps team seems to be people who want to be 'developers' rather than people who care about 'ops'. Yaml slinging without thinking about what the yaml actually means.

karmarepellent 1 day ago

I think the value proposition holds when you are just getting started with your company and you happen to employ people that know their way around the hyperscaler cloud ecosystems.

But I agree that moving your own infra or outsourcing operations when you have managed to do it on your own for a while is most likely misguided. Speaking from experience it introduces costs that cannot possibly be calculdated before the fact and thus always end up more complicated and costlier than the suits imagined.

In the past, when similar decicions were made, I always thought to myself: You could have just hired one more person bringing their own, fresh perspective on what we are doing in order to improve our ops game.

wyclif 15 hours ago

Oh, I've seen this before and it's true in an anecdotal sense for me. One reason why is that they always think of hiring an additional developer as a cost, never savings.