> despite unlimited levels of political hostility, abuse, and algorithmic shenanigans from the ownership
This was happening before Musk bought it but now that it’s coming from the socially unacceptable side of the political spectrum people don’t like it
It is now a private company, with an owner who openly campaigned for a particular candidate and is now expected to take a role in that candidate's administration.
You can see the difference, right?
One is certainly more visibly political while the other is much harder to see. Seems like even you are confused by it.
So, you do see a difference. Meanwhile, you still ignore the difference in being a public vs. private company and the necessary disclosures that come from that difference.
That said, please open my eyes. I have yet to see you provide anything to support your stance that the publicly-traded, pre-Elon version of Twitter was equally as active in pushing a political agenda as the current version.
It's ok to admit, even if the guy is on your team.
The recovered documents that showed communication between the whitehouse and twitter resulting in censorship around covid and other issues like the laptop from hunter biden. It was political, hidden and many will say eviler before Musk.